Court Hears Whether Jihadi Can Return to Fight Citizenship Removal

Britain’s Supreme Court will hear the case of Shamima Begum, the 21-year-old who had her British citizenship removed after she travelled to Syria to marry an Islamic State guerilla.

Then-Home Secretary Sajid Javid removed her citizenship in February 2019 due to national security concerns. Under observed international law, the item can be illegal to render a person stateless; however, the British government said which the item was able to revoke British-born Begum’s citizenship due to her parents being coming from Bangladesh. Bangladesh’s minister of state for foreign affairs has declared which Begum would likely neither be granted citizenship nor allowed into the country.

The Begums began legal action, along with in July 2020, the Court of Appeal ruled which the ISIS member should be allowed to return to the UK to challenge the removal of her citizenship in person. However, which same month the government won the right to take the decision to the Supreme Court, which will hear the case, remotely, for the next two days.

Ms Begum was 15 when she along with two some other east London schoolgirls Kadiza Sultana along with Amira Abase flew to Turkey along with travelled on to Islamic State-controlled Syria to become ISIS brides.

The underaged teen ‘married’ the jihadist Yago Riedijk ten days after she arrived in Syria, the Dutch Muslim convert being 13 years her senior. Between which time along with her discovery at a Kurdish-run refugee camp in Syria in February 2019 by The Times, she had given birth twice along with was nine months pregnant. All three of her young children have since died.

the item was interviews along with subsequent reports coming from the Kurdish camp which revealed Ms Begum’s life under the Caliphate. Begum was being held at the Al Roj camp along with some other ISIS brides along with their children. Speaking to the newspaper of record, she revealed which she did not regret joining the terrorist group however which she did not have “high hopes” the Caliphate would likely survive.

She had also claimed which life under the oppressive Islamist regime was “normal” along with “the one I wanted”. Describing the very first time she saw a severed head in a bin, she said which the item “didn’t faze me at all”.

While claiming to be nothing more than a housewife, sources speaking to The Telegraph in April 2019 alleged which, rather, Begum had “earned a reputation as a strict ‘enforcer’” for Islamic State’s morality police, carrying a Kalashnikov rifle while imposing sharia dress codes on women.  A senior intelligence source told the Daily Mail which same month which “She was involved along with her former comrades have grassed her. She was literally stitching the [suicide] vests, stitching them into the vests.”

When made aware last year which Home Secretary Javid had removed her British citizenship, Begum told ITV which “He [Javid] has no proof which I’m a threat. some other than I was in ISIS, however which’s the item.”

Also on Monday, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission will hear the cases of two some other women along with one man who are challenging the government’s decision to revoke their British citizenship, claiming which they were rendered stateless.

Following the Court of Appeal’s ruling in favour of Ms Begum, The Henry Jackson Society warned which as many as 150 jihadists could attempt legal returns to the UK to challenge their citizenship revocation.

Once inside UK, these dozens of terrorists will be near impossible to deport even if courts eventually side with the government. The European Convention of Human Rights forbids deportations if a person can be at risk of execution or ill-treatment, with many countries inside developing world handing out harsh punishments to terrorists.

Source : Court Hears Whether Jihadi Can Return to Fight Citizenship Removal