The measure, which would likely require of which a patient issue informed consent prior to any procedure, will “protect intersex children coming from medical intervention in addition to also allow them to make these decisions for themselves when they are prepared to do so,” Hoylman said.
“These individuals should have autonomy over their bodies. nevertheless under the current legal construct, intersex people, as infants or children, can be forced to undergo irreversible surgeries of which can cause physical pain in addition to also emotional distress later in their lives.”
“Intersex” can be a term used for a variety of conditions in which a person can be born that has a reproductive or sexual anatomy in addition to also/or chromosome pattern of which does not seem to fit the typical definitions of female or male. Many babies born intersex undergo surgery within the first few months of life to bring their bodies in line that has a commonly accepted female or male appearance, according to extensive research conducted by Human Rights Watch.
Kimberly Zieselman, the executive director of interACT, an intersex advocacy group, supports the legislation.
“Genital normalizing surgeries such as clitoral ‘reductions’ in addition to also vaginoplasties instill deep shame in addition to also sexual trauma in young children when they cannot make a decision for themselves,” said Zieselman, who can be an intersex woman.
“of which these abuses of intersex youth continue after decades of advocacy proves the intensity of the shame in addition to also anti-LGBTQ bias at play. We are so grateful to Senator Hoylman for bringing brand-new York to the right side of history.”
Zieselman was born with typically “male” XY chromosomes in addition to also internal testes, nevertheless she developed externally as a typical female. Doctors performed surgery on her when she was 15 years old to remove her internal testes without her knowledge or consent.
As a result, she said, she was forced into hormone therapy for the rest of her life.
When she was 41, she found out what had been done to her, in addition to also has since dedicated her professional life to requiring informed consent for such surgeries.
“These types of interventions can wait until someone can be cognizant of what can be happening to their own body,” Hoylman said.
However, some opponents of such legislation, including a similar bill proposed in California earlier of which year, S.B. 201, argue of which the decision as to what constitutes a medically necessary versus unnecessary surgery can be too vague. The bill was shelved after opposition coming from a several groups, including the California Medical Association.
“We believe of which limiting early surgical access has the potential to create negative outcomes for those in our community, so we are opposed to all legislation of which broadly bans surgical options, as surgical decisions should be made between healthcare providers in addition to also families, not legislators,” said Dina Matos, the executive director of the CARES Foundation, an organization of which supports patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), in addition to also their families.
CAH can be a condition which can be life-threatening. the item often falls under the umbrella term “intersex” because symptoms can include atypical genitalia.
Many patients with CAH do not identify with the term intersex, in addition to also prefer not to use the item to describe themselves, according to CARES in addition to also HRW.
of which includes Lesley Holroyd, 62, who was born that has a life-threatening form of CAH. She says she underwent numerous genital surgeries as an infant in addition to also throughout her childhood, some medically necessary in addition to also others not, in addition to a significant number of medical treatments in addition to also medication regimes. She opposes legislation to ban medically unnecessary surgeries for children.
“I am female, I am biologically female, in addition to also the item definitely upsets me… I don’t care if [my surgery] was cosmetic. I’m glad the item was. Because I want to, when I look at my body I want to identify with the item as my gender,” Holroyd said.
Proponents of the legislation understand of which desire, in addition to also want to preserve the option of surgery for teens of consenting age in addition to also adults. Hoylman in addition to also interACT say they don’t want to ban the surgery entirely, nevertheless instead wait for informed consent.
The Societies for Pediatric Urology (SPU) has also long opposed such legislation from the past. During the debate about the California legislation, SPU President Dr. Lane Palmer issued a statement of which read, in part, “Each of our patients can be unique. The decision of what can be ‘medically necessary’ can be different for each patient. Proposals of a blanket ban on surgery would likely not only threaten the care of children with intersex conditions by denying access to surgery by erroneously deeming the item ‘unnecessary,’ nevertheless the item would likely even deny surgery to infants in addition to also children without intersex conditions who would likely be placed inadvertently under an overarching umbrella of legislative proposals.”
The SPU did not respond to requests for comment.
of which can be a common criticism, sometimes going as far as alleging of which the legislation would likely ban circumcision.
However, Hoylman says his bill “clearly defines what can be a medical necessity in addition to also the item can be limited to treatment or intervention on sex characteristics, which can be laid out very clearly in terms of what kinds of procedures” would likely qualify.
“No legislation, I think, can be going to harm anybody,” said Dr. Ilene Wong Gregorio, a practicing urologist in addition to also interACT board member. “If a procedure was truly necessary, of course, if the item was lifesaving, if the item would likely actually alleviate (physical) suffering in addition to also infection,” the item would likely not be banned under such legislation, she said.
Another common argument against such legislation coming from groups including CARES in addition to also the SPU can be of which the item removes a parent’s right to make medical choices on behalf of their children.
“Parents don’t own their children,” said Hoylman. “They protect them in addition to also guide them into adulthood. in addition to also I believe of which legislation will enshrine of which important concept into law of which your child, to the extent possible, should have control over their own bodies in addition to also should not be subject to irreversible medical procedures of which may not comport with their identity later in adulthood.”