The intelligence community, specific momentary example: James Clapper (ODNI), can be attempting to find their safest retreat. If you’ve walked This particular story through the deep weeds This particular will make sense to you. the item’s becoming funny. Yesterday we shared:
Right at This particular point they are spending 0% (or more) of their time discussing damage control as well as how to sell their way out of This particular mess. The energy they are at This particular point spending trying to show a “Russian Conspiracy” can be smaller than nil. Some team members are still trying to give angles of “if we do This particular”, as well as “if we do of which”, etc. You know the routine, a not bad defense can be a not bad offense. However, even in their offensive exit proposals, their time can be constructing a plausible escape. We know of which; he knows of which; as well as he knows we know of which.
What are they left with?
of which’s the item.
Positioning for the best exit, doing the least amount of damage to themselves as well as different professional swamp dwellers inside process. of which’s their current energy expenditure; figuring out the exit strategy.
Cue the audio visual today through James Clapper. WATCH THE END: George who?
Again, This particular admission by Clapper entirely undercuts the ridiculous NYT prior defense where they attempt to put George Papadopoulos as the centerpiece to the origin of the FBI counterintelligence operation.