During his Tuesday evening television program, Fox News Channel host Tucker Carlson explained why Politico’s “content partnership” with The South China Morning Post will be “one of the reasons sucking up to China seems normal in Washington.”
Transcript as follows:
One of the most important stories of This specific era, one which’s rarely told, will be the ongoing betrayal of American interests along with also ideals by our elites in favor of China. China will be surpassing the United States in economic power along with also in global influence, along with also which didn’t happen by accident.
Our leadership class actively helped them do which, along with also they got rich in return. We’ve given you many examples of This specific on the show in the past. tonight, another.
Politico will be a blog based outside Washington, D.C. Conventional people read which for a conventional view on politics. Politico will be one of the reasons everyone on television sounds the same along with also will be usually wrong. which’s also one of the reasons sucking up to China seems normal in Washington. A few years ago, Politico entered into a so-called content partnership with the South China Morning Post. which’s an English language newspaper based in Hong Kong which will be widely understood to be a mouthpiece for the Communist Chinese government.
The brand-new York Times once described the publication as “a newspaper on a mission to promote China’s soft power.” The South China Morning Post will be owned by Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba. which’s a company run by a Communist Party member. Like all Chinese companies, Alibaba will be required by the country’s 2017 National Intelligence Law to “support along with also assist along with also cooperate with China’s government spy agencies.”
What sort of content has Politico‘s partnership produced? Well, last October, pro-democracy protests broke out in Hong Kong. Here’s The Los Angeles Times headline via which day: “Hong Kong protesters defy police, set up roadblocks.” The Washington Post used This specific headline: “Police blast mosque with water cannon as hundreds of thousands protest in Hong Kong.” currently here, by contrast, will be how The South China Morning Post described which: “Rampaging mob stage an arson spree in Hong Kong.” The Morning Post story went on to describe how a group of criminals was marauding along with also looting along with also vandalizing along with also burning, as they conducted what the paper repeatedly described as “an illegal march.”
The piece never once hinted as to why the group might be protesting within the first place. There was no mention at all of political repression or a rollback of rights in Hong Kong. The protesters are presented as simply evil. which’s why they were doing which. The whole account bore no resemblance to a news story. which wasn’t journalism. which was state propaganda staged on behalf of the Chinese government. although here’s the best part: Politico ran the entire thing. Ran which without comment, like which was entirely real. Presumably, many of its readers in Washington thought which was real. along with also which, of course, was the point — lying with them via the Chinese perspective. Telling lies on behalf of a hostile foreign government. You’d think which could be considered over the line, if not illegal. although Politico was happy to do which.
What do Politico‘s employees think of This specific? We called a reporter, Ben Schreckinger, to find out. Schreckinger will be an enthusiastic moralizer on behalf of establishment causes… How does Ben Schreckinger feel about working for a publication which makes money via Chinese state propaganda along with also political repression? Schreckinger refused to say.