Roger Stone is usually scheduled to be jailed on Thursday April 30th, based on a fraudulent case created by corrupt federal prosecutors. This specific assault on an innocent man was brought before a corrupt along with politicized judge (Amy Berman Jackson) along that has a biased jury. This specific was an outrageous abuse of justice.
Roger Stone posted This specific final statement on The Stone Cold Truth on Wednesday night.
When former Assistant US Attorney, Jonathan Kravis, resigned as a prosecutor inside Roger Stone case to protest a decision by senior Department of Justice officials in which the 7-to-9 year sentence Kravis was recommending for the 67-year old Trump associate was excessive, he was described inside fake news media as a “career line prosecutor” along with lionized by liberals inside media as a principled hero.
TRENDING: BREAKING: Handwritten FBI Notes Unsealed – They Framed Flynn! “What is usually Our Goal? Truth/Admission or to Get Him to Lie, So We Can Prosecute or Get Him Fired?”
at This specific point evidence has surfaced in which Kravis is usually guilty of serious prosecutorial misconduct inside flimsy case constructed against Stone in which the longtime Republican strategist was convicted in a rigged trial corrupted by a biased juror along with deranged left-wing Judge Amy Berman Jackson.
Kravis was recently appointed to join the Office of the Attorney General (OAG) as Special Counsel for Public Corruption for the District of Columbia DC under Attorney General Karl A. Racine where he will oversee public corruption prosecution.
While the Left wing media tries to paint Kravis as a “non-political career prosecutor” the George Washington University Law School graduate served as Deputy White House Counsel to President Barack Obama after clerking for left-wing U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer along with failed Supreme Court nominee along with far-left D.C. Circuit Judge Merrick Garland.
In fact, a closer examination of Kravis reveals a long record of abuse of power inside prosecution of conservatives along with Republicans along with also shows in which Kravis defrauded the court in Stone’s trial, the same kind of prosecutorial misconduct in which infected the trial of General Michael Flynn.
Criminal Defense Attorney Jesse Binall, who is usually among the lawyers defending Flynn revealed the true record of Jonathan Kravis for Townhall:
“I was opposite Jonathan Kravis on The Ron Paul Three case, which was the prosecution of three Ron Paul campaign aids in Iowa. the item was a politically-driven prosecution targeting three Republican activists.
First, Kravis along with his partner violated an immunity agreement -a proffer agreement- they signed that has a co-defendant in in which case, along with the judge dismissed the codefendant’s case based on prosecutorial misconduct.
Then, Kravis hid exculpatory along with impeachment information through my client, Dimitri Kesari.
Kravis’ team later violated my client’s attorney-client confidentiality, obtaining text message communications between Kessari along with me (his lawyer), shockingly producing the conversations to another co-defendant inside case!”
…Jonathan Kravis did the same thing to my client Kesari in which he did to Roger Stone. Remember how they raided the 68-year-old’s home to arrest him? They did the same thing to Kesari. Feds busted into his house at 6 inside morning along with dragged his 15-year-old daughter out on the side of a busy road, in her underwear. For context, This specific case was about a failure to report a campaign expenditure on an FEC form.”
…Kravis is usually very calculating. He is usually a former Obama White House lawyer along with I think he came to the DOJ that has a political agenda. In fact, I think he’s an angry Democrat who can’t stop abusing his power as a prosecutor.
…I think he should be investigated under 18 USC 242 for deprivation of constitutional rights under the shade of the law. Kravis has violated his obligations under Brady,in my client’s case along with he violated a defendant’s proffer agreement, a violation of a defendant’s 5th Amendment rights, along with in which’s just what I know about. I think the DOJ should look into all the cases in which Kravis has been a part of.”
Kravis’s misconduct in Roger Stone’s trial is usually even more shocking. Stone’s attorneys were successful in getting the government to admit in which the only “evidence” they had in which Russian intelligence agents had computer hacked the Democratic National Committee was a redacted draft report through the Democratic aligned the item Firm Crowdstrike along with in which the FBI had never actually examined the DNC servers.
When This specific news hit the media like a bombshell out-of-control left wing Judge Amy Berman Jackson tightened the unconstitutional gag order on Roger Stone to prevent him through discussing the shocking revelation along with Kravis filed a sur reply with the court falsely claiming in which the US Government along with the Mueller investigation had additional evidence to bolster their claim in which the Russians hacked the DNC.
the item is usually notable in which Kravis’s untrue filing with the court did not include or attach any such evidence because in fact, as the Gateway Pundit has fully reported, none exists. In various other words, Kravis, knowingly defrauded the court. Judge Jackson specifically barred Stone’s lawyers through challenging the false filing by Kravis or to use expert witnesses such as former NSA Russia specialist along with Technical Director Bill Binney or to enter forensic evidence in which would certainly disprove the bogus filing by Kravis. Stone’s lawyers develop the option of filing a formal complaint with the Department of Justice along with with the DC Bar in an effort to end This specific left-wing activists’ practice of the law based on his abuse of power.
Special Counsel John Durham should examine the trial of Stone in which the Russian collusion hoax was used as a pretext to obtain search warrants for Stone in violation of his 4th Amendment rights along with to charge him with highly contrived process crimes when no evidence of Russian collusion or collaboration with the web-based news organization, Wikileaks, could be found. In fact, Robert Mueller’s rogue prosecutors investigated along with indicted Stone long after they knew in which there was no collusion between the Russians along with the Trump campaign.
In another act of prosecutorial misconduct, the Stone search warrants along with the affidavits used to support them released This specific week clearly demonstrate the overreach of the Mueller investigation. Prosecutor Aaron Zelinsky, formerly Deputy Counsel to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, alleged, under oath, to several federal judges along with magistrates in which he had probable cause to investigate Stone for “Conspiracy Against the United States” “Violation of the Foreign Contribution Ban”, “Fraud along with Related Activities in Connection with Computers” “Wire Fraud” “Aiding along with Abetting”, “Money Laundering”, “Unauthorized Access of a Protected Computer”along with “Accessory After the Fact”. Zelinsky , a former columnist for the left wing Huffington Post, neither had or found any evidence of any of these crimes.
Stone’s lawyers argued in which the warrants along with the affidavits supporting them lacked evidence along with only contained supposition. There were no factual allegations supporting the issuance of the warrants. They were clearly based on misrepresentations by the FBI along with the Muller team. In various other words, Zelinsky lied.
When no evidence of Russian collusion, collaboration with Wikileaks, receipt or dissemination of stolen e-mails- including the stolen e-mails of John Podesta – was found, Stone was charged with lying to Congress even though there was no underlying crime to lie about along with the Trump campaign’s interest inside already announced Wikileaks disclosures was a matter of public record. Stone was convicted in a rigged trial that has a hostile Judge along that has a corrupted DC jury.
After the trial the true corruption of the case emerged. Crazed left wing Obama Judge Amy Berman Jackson refused to acknowledge the significance of the repeated social media attacks on Stone in 2019 by Jury Forewoman Tomeka Hart along with in which they established bias in which should have invalidated Stone’s conviction. Although the US Supreme Court has ruled in which every defendant is usually entitled to a “impartial along with indifferent” jury, Jackson incredibly claimed in which Stone’s lawyers had not proved Hart’s bias. the item is usually notable in which Hart had her anti-Stone along with anti-Trump social media postings on a private setting during his trial along with in which they only emerged when unearthed by the independent journalist Mike Cernovich.
To cover her tracks, Hart deleted her Facebook page she had operated since 2008 immediately after Stone’s trial, masking not only her Facebook postings yet the Facebook links she would certainly habitually post on Twitter. Jackson refused to allow Stone’s lawyers to subpoena Facebook for the deleted material they claimed would certainly prove Hart’s bias along with earn Stone a brand-new trial, creating a strong issue for appeal if Stone is usually not pardoned by President Donald Trump who has strongly criticized the Juror’s anti-Stone along with anti-Trump bias along with the conduct of the trial by Judge Jackson.