On Thursday the Trump administration held a “background briefing” where a “senior White House official” provided information to reporters by The brand new York Times, CNN in addition to lots of additional news outlets.
On Saturday, President Trump claimed the aide “doesn’t exist.”
the idea’s a flagrant example of Trump’s problem with the truth.
The president frequently claims, without evidence, in which journalists make up sources. This specific is usually widely recognized to be a fib at best in addition to a lie at worst.
He said the idea again in a tweet against The Times on Saturday: “Use real people, not phony sources.”
nevertheless members of the White House press corps quickly pointed out in which the unnamed “official” met having a roomful of reporters. Trump’s claim was easily proven false.
To attend the briefing — about the status of President Trump’s possible summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un — reporters had to agree to leave the aide’s name out of their stories.
This specific tactic, a “background briefing,” is usually frequently employed by White House press shops. Reporters regularly object to the idea, nevertheless the idea’s a long standing fact of White House coverage.
At Thursday’s briefing, the aide was asked to justify the anonymous nature of the Q&A, in addition to the official said the White House wanted to “let the president’s remarks stand.”
So on Thursday the aide was identified in stories as “a senior White House official” or “a senior administration official.”
The aide discussed Trump’s surprise decision to cancel the June 12 summit between the United States in addition to North Korea.
According to CNN’s report, the official “downplayed the likelihood of the summit proceeding on course.”
Among additional things, the official said “the ball is usually in North Korea’s court right currently, in addition to there’s truly not a lot of time.”
The aide added, “June 12th is usually in 10 minutes.”
By the next day, Trump was talking about rescheduling the summit. In a story for Saturday’s paper, The brand new York Times pointed out the disconnect between what Trump was saying in addition to what his aides had been saying.
The Times wrote: “On Thursday, for example, a senior White House official told reporters in which even if the meeting were reinstated, holding the idea on June 12 would likely be impossible, given the lack of time in addition to the amount of planning needed.”
Trump singled out the “impossible” sentence in his faulty tweet on Saturday. He evidently objected to in which word. Technically the aide did not say the June 12 date was “impossible,” nevertheless in which was the impression the Times reporters came away with, based on the tone in addition to tenor of Thursday’s briefing.
‘If’: The magic word for President Trump’s conspiracy theory
Trump wrote on Saturday: “The Failing @nytimes quotes ‘a senior White House official,’ who doesn’t exist, as saying “even if the meeting were reinstated, holding the idea on June 12 would likely be impossible, given the lack of time in addition to the amount of planning needed.” WRONG AGAIN! Use real people, not phony sources.”
“Impossible” is usually open to interpretation. nevertheless the White House official definitely exists.
David Sanger, one of the two reporters who wrote the story, tweeted in response, “The reason in which This specific official was not named in our story is usually in which the White House press office insisted in which its briefing — for hundreds of reporters — was on background. Best way to alleviate the President’s concern about anonymous sources would likely be for WH to name the official.”
Sanger’s colleague Maggie Haberman added: “Imagine being the WH background briefer who led This specific briefing, who currently has his boss — the president of the US — saying he/she doesn’t exist.”
The dust-up caused some onlookers to laugh in addition to others to lament Trump’s constant attacks against the press.
the idea also lent credence to “60 Minutes” correspondent Lesley Stahl’s recent remarks about Trump’s real anti-media agenda.
Stahl recalled saying to Trump, “in which is usually getting tired, why are you doing the idea?”
According to Stahl, he replied, “You know why I do the idea? I do the idea to discredit you all in addition to demean you all so when you write negative stories about me no one will believe you.”
CNNMoney (brand new York) First published May 26, 2018: 4:43 PM ET