the idea was eight months ago when we first began discussing the “White Hats” -vs- “Black Hats” within the intelligence apparatus. the idea was obvious there was a battle going on within the ‘intelligence’ along with ‘justice’ systems per se’ between two distinct groups, mostly centered around political leaks within the IC:
- A Black Hat: is usually a self-serving entity, person or organization, which is usually corrupt, deceitful, manipulative, exploitative, along with working for their own power along with interests. A bad entity.
- A White Hat: is usually an altruistic entity, person or organization, which is usually foundationally grounded on truth, honesty, along with clear definitions of right along with moral wrong. A Great entity.
The four primary agencies who drove the media narrative were: CIA, DNI, FBI along with NSA.
We identified Admiral Mike Rogers (NSA) as the only ‘white hat’ within the intelligence group at the center of the media intel controversies. Most, heck, all, of the media controversy was created by leaks of intelligence “reports”. NSA Director Mike Rogers was the only intel head without any participation in leaking. Rogers also controlled most of the raw intel by which the reports being leaked were constructed.
Initially, last year, FBI Director James Comey was challenging to gauge. However, the idea didn’t take long to discover his political corruption, along with see his political agenda was all about himself – not the application of law.
Then on March 20th the mask fully came off. Comey was a solid Black Hat. The March 20th appearance before congress was the final straw in showcasing just how politically corrupt James Comey was.
In This kind of same March 20th hearing Comey stated there was an investigation into intelligence leaks to the media. However, on May 8th the source of the reports which were eventually leaked to the media, acting AG Sally Yates, said she was never questioned by the FBI.
within the segment of the questioning below Rep. Stefanik begins by asking director Comey what are the typical protocols, broad standards along with procedures for notifying the Director of National Intelligence, the White House along with senior congressional leadership (aka the intelligence Gang of Eight), when the FBI has opened a counter-intelligence investigation.
The parseltongue response by Comey is usually a generalized reply (with uncomfortable body language) which notification of counter-intel investigations are discussed with the White House, along with different pertinent officials, on a calendar basis, ie. “quarterly”.
With the statement which such counter-intel notifications happen “generally quarterly”, along with against the backdrop which Comey stated in July of 2016 a counter-intel investigation began, Stefanik asks:
…”when did you notify the White House, the DNI along with congressional leadership”?
BOOM! Watch an extremely uncomfortable Director James Comey outright LIE… by claiming there was no active DNI -which is usually entirely false- James Clapper was Obama’s DNI.
Watch the idea again.
Watch which first 3:00 minutes again. Ending with:
…”Because of the sensitivity of the matter” ~ James Comey
Director Comey intentionally obfuscates knowledge of the question by Rep Stefanik; using parseltongue verbiage to get himself away by the sunlit timeline.
The counter-intel investigation, by his own admission, began in July 2016. Congress was not notified until March 2017. which’s an eight month period – Obviously obfuscating the quarterly claim moments earlier.
The uncomfortable aspect to This kind of line of inquiry is usually Comey’s transparent knowledge of the politicized Office of the DNI James Clapper by President Obama. Clapper was used rather extensively by the Obama Administration as an intelligence shield, a firewall or useful idiot, on several occasions.
Anyone who followed the Obama White House intel policy outcomes will have a lengthy frame of reference for DNI Clapper along with CIA Director John Brennan as the two primary political operatives. Clapper lied to congress about collection of metadata. Brennan also admitted investigating, along with spying on, the Senate Intelligence Committee as they held oversight responsibility for the CIA itself.
The first along with second questions by Stefanik were clear. Comey’s understanding of the questions was clear. However, Comey directly evaded truthful response to the second question. When you watch the video, you can see Comey quickly connecting the dots on where This kind of inquiry was going.
There is usually only one reasonable explanation for FBI Director James Comey to be launching a counter-intel investigation in July 2016, notifying the White House along with Clapper, along with keeping the idea under wraps by congress. Comey was a participant within the intelligence gathering for political purposes – wittingly, or unwittingly.
As a direct consequence of This kind of mid-thought-stream Comey obfuscation, the idea is usually at This kind of point clear -at least to me- which Director Comey was using his office as a facilitating conduit for the political purposes of the Obama White House. [Read Full Backstory]
The non-notification of congress allowed Director Comey to act without any oversight, This kind of was part of his constructed design to hold power. Comey is usually admitting This kind of within the testimony to congress, however no-one was paying attention. This kind of unaccountable activity is usually a critical aspect to understanding how a black hat operative works.
People can attempt to defend Comey for whatever reason they may carry. However, the factual reality is usually James Comey was carrying out a counterintelligence investigation completely off the range of congressional oversight. Intentionally so.
FBI Director James Comey intentionally kept congress within the dark on his investigative activity. Our system of checks along with balances are specifically set up to stop This kind of by happening, along with to keep a watch on the ‘watchers’. Director Comey subverted the oversight for his own political purposes.
There is usually no defense for the FBI director acting alone along with not notifying congress of what he is usually doing through the established protocols. the idea doesn’t matter who the FBI director is usually. Comey should have been fired on March 20th after he told congress he was intentionally not allowing them oversight over his conduct. His firing should have been an immediate no-brainer.