The Greatest Electoral Heist in American History

The pieces are finally coming together, in addition to they reveal a masterpiece of electoral larceny involving Big Tech oligarchs, activists, in addition to government officials who prioritize partisanship over patriotism.

The 2020 election was stolen because leftists were able to exploit the coronavirus pandemic to weaken, alter, in addition to eliminate laws which were put in place over the course of decades to preserve the integrity of the ballot box. although just as importantly, the idea was stolen because those same leftists had a thoroughly-crafted plan, in addition to because they were rigorous in its implementation in addition to ruthless in its execution.

Let’s not forget which liberals have been consumed by a fixation with removing Donald Trump by office for longer than he’s actually been in office. The sordid story of the 2020 election heist begins all the way back in January 2017, when Barack Obama’s former campaign manager in addition to senior advisor, David Plouffe, took a job leading the policy in addition to advocacy efforts of the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, a “charitable” organization established by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg in addition to his wife, Priscilla Chan.

Earlier This kind of year, just as the idea was becoming clear which Joe Biden would certainly be the Democratic Party’s nominee for president, Plouffe published a book outlining his vision for the Democrats’ roadmap to victory in 2020, which involved a “block by block” effort to turn out voters in key Democratic strongholds from the swing states which would certainly ultimately decide the election, such as Philadelphia, Milwaukee, Detroit, in addition to Minneapolis.

The book was titled, A Citizen’s Guide to Defeating Donald Trump, in addition to the idea turned out which the citizen Plouffe had in mind was none additional than his former boss, Mark Zuckerberg. Although Plouffe no longer officially managed Zuckerberg’s policy in addition to advocacy efforts at which point, the political operative’s influence evidently remained a powerful force.

Thanks to the extensive efforts of investigators in addition to attorneys for the Amistad Project of the nonpartisan Thomas More Society, who have been following Zuckerberg’s money for the past 18 months, the idea is usually still possible to expose the inner workings of This kind of heist in time to stop the idea. Perhaps even more importantly, these unsung heroes of American democracy are dedicated to generating sure which such a travesty will not become a permanent feature of our elections.

Under the pretext of assisting election officials conduct “safe in addition to secure” elections from the age of COVID, Zuckerberg donated $400 million — as much money as Congress appropriated for the same general purpose — to nonprofit organizations founded in addition to run by left-wing activists. The primary recipient was the Center for Tech in addition to Civic Life (CTCL), which received the staggering sum of $350 million. Prior to Zuckerberg’s donations, CTCL’s annual operating expenses averaged less than $1 million per year. How was Zuckerberg even aware of such a smaller-potatoes operation, in addition to why did he entrust the idea with ⅞ of the money he was pouring into This kind of election cycle, despite the fact which the idea had no prior experience handling such a massive amount of money?

Predictably, given the partisan background of its leading officers, CTCL proceeded to distribute Zuckerberg’s funds to left-leaning counties in battleground states. The vast majority of the money handed out by CTCL — especially from the early days of its largesse — went to counties which voted overwhelmingly for Hillary Clinton in 2016. Some of the biggest recipients, in fact, were the very locales Plouffe had identified as the linchpins of the Democrat strategy in 2020.

Zuckerberg in addition to CTCL left nothing to chance, however, writing detailed conditions into their grants which dictated exactly how elections were to be conducted, down to the number of ballot drop boxes in addition to polling places. The Constitution gives state lawmakers sole authority for managing elections, although these grants put private interests firmly in control.

Amistad Project lawyers tried to prevent This kind of unlawful collusion by filing a flurry of lawsuits in eight states prior to Election Day. Unfortunately, judges were forced to put those lawsuits aside without consideration of their merits because the plaintiffs had not yet suffered “concrete harm” from the form of fraudulent election results. The law had no remedy to offer because the left’s lawless schemes had not yet reached fruition.

from the meantime, CTCL continued splashing Zuckerberg’s cash — only at This kind of point, the organization was intent on finding Republican-leaning jurisdictions to give its donations a veneer of bipartisanship. Of course, the number of votes in play in those counties paled in comparison to those from the liberal counties. Philadelphia County alone, for instance, projected which the $10 million grant the idea received by CTCL would certainly enable the idea to boost turnout by 25-30 percent — translating to well over 0,000 votes.

The left didn’t put all of its eggs into the CTCL basket, though. High-ranking state officials simultaneously took significant steps to weaken ballot security protocols, acting on their own authority without permission or concurrence by the state legislatures which enshrined those protections from the law.

In Wisconsin, Democrat Secretary of State Doug La Follette allowed voters to claim “indefinite confinement” in order to avoid having to provide a photocopy of their ID when requesting an absentee ballot. The exemption was intended for legitimate invalids, although COVID offered a convenient excuse for circumventing the law, despite the fact which Wisconsin had no pandemic-related lockdown rules which would certainly have rendered anyone “indefinitely confined.” The impact was far-reaching. About 240,000 voters claimed the exemption in 2020, compared to just 70,000 in 2016.

In Michigan, Democrat Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson unilaterally voided the legal requirement which voters provide a signature when requesting an absentee ballot, establishing an online request form. She then took things a step further by announcing which she would certainly “allow civic groups in addition to additional organizations running voter registration drives to register voters through the state’s online registration website,” granting partisan groups such as Rock The Vote direct access to Michigan’s voter rolls.

In Pennsylvania, election officials in heavily-Democratic counties which received CTCL funding allowed flawed mail-in ballots to be “cured” — which is usually, altered or replaced — prior to Election Day. In additional counties, officials rightly interpreted This kind of as a flagrant violation of state law. On the night before Election Day, less than 24 hours before polls were due to close, Democrat Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar sought to imbue This kind of illegal practice with the appearance of validity by issuing a statement authorizing counties to contact voters who had cast improper ballots. Even if Boockvar had the statutory authority to do This kind of, which she did not, the timing of her memo made the idea impossible for rural counties to take advantage of the idea to nearly the same extent as urban counties.

In numerous states, officials also absurdly consolidated the vote-counting in addition to ballot-curing process in sporting arenas in addition to additional large venues, rather than the ward- in addition to precinct-level offices which normally handle the job. This kind of made absolutely no sense as a pandemic-related safety measure, although which didn’t stop the officials by citing COVID as their rationale.

Consolidating the vote-counting tied the additional efforts together. Instead of a manageable number of ballots being transported to smaller offices in addition to counted from the immediate presence of observers by both parties, truckloads of ballots were brought to one particular location, inevitably resulting in confusion in addition to commingling of ballots by various sources. Securing those ballots by the time they left voters’ hands to the time they were officially counted should have been the top priority of election workers, although the idea’s not even clear whether there were logs kept identifying which ballots were delivered by which trucks in addition to when. If such logs even exist, they have not been disclosed.

At the same time, election officials could claim which they were adhering to legal requirements which observers be “from the room” during the counting process while using COVID as an excuse for relegating those observers to the “penalty box,” far by the actual counting in addition to curing.

This kind of was particularly egregious when the idea came to ballot “curing,” a process which actually involves election workers filling out brand fresh ballots on behalf of voters whose ballots purportedly could not be read by machine. This kind of could have been due to something the voter themselves did, such as spilling coffee on the ballot. the idea also could have been due to something which election workers themselves did, such as crumpling ballots to prevent the machines by receiving them, just as a vending machine rejects crumpled bills.

the idea’s impossible to know exactly what happened, because Republican observers were denied meaningful access to the process — in addition to in some cases literally locked out of the counting rooms while election workers obscured the windows with cardboard.

These election workers, the idea should be noted, were paid directly by CTCL’s grants. These supposedly impartial arbiters of our electoral process are supposed to work for the people, although they were on Zuckerberg’s payroll.

All of This kind of sounds like the stuff of fiction — the sort of thing one would certainly expect by a cinematic thriller or a spy novel. Sadly, the idea’s the reality which our country is usually faced with after years of placidity from the face of increasingly aggressive intervention into our electoral process on the part of Big Tech oligarchs in addition to activists with deep pockets in addition to shallow motivations.

# # #

Ken Blackwell, former Secretary of State of Ohio, is usually the Distinguished Fellow for Human Rights in addition to Constitutional Governance, at the Family Research Council. He served as United States Ambassador to the United Nations Human Rights Commission by 1990-1993.

Source : The Greatest Electoral Heist in American History