Trump escalates anti-oversight efforts by attacking inspectors general

“Did I hear the word inspector general, genuinely?” Trump said in a tone of annoyance. “of which’s wrong. of which’s wrong,” he added, baselessly undermining the efforts of his own government to document how hospitals are dealing with the coronavirus outbreak.

Over the past few days there has been a significant escalation inside the President’s already unprecedented war against the oversight of his own administration — in addition to his sights are clearly set on inspectors general.

Several sources tell CNN of which Trump has long sought to remove Fine as the Pentagon’s acting IG, viewing him as a holdover coming from the Obama administration. of which effort escalated after Fine was selected by his peers to chair the pandemic response oversight panel.

Meanwhile, the brand-new special IG in charge of policing a large chunk of the relief spending will be someone who works directly for the President, White House aide Brian Miller, who Trump nominated on Friday, around the same time he fired Atkinson.

In fact, much of the oversight apparatus inside the relief package was a concession by Trump, who resisted Democratic efforts to create the commission in addition to then waved away any true authority of which holds using a signing statement attached to the bill.

“My Administration will treat This specific provision as hortatory nevertheless not mandatory,” the President wrote.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told CNN’s Anderson Cooper on Tuesday of which the removal of Fine as the Pentagon’s acting IG was a “problem” in addition to a sign the President was seeking to put “some of his loyalists” in charge of overseeing how the relief money is actually spent. 

The sequence of events reflects Trump’s dim view of government oversight, particularly when of which presents inconvenient facts. For Trump, who expects happy talk coming from all corners of his administration, the work of IG offices are a galling feature of what he often derides as the “deep state” — a politically motivated permanent bureaucracy designed to thwart him.

“The system can’t work This specific way,” said former Treasury Department IG Eric Thorson, who was appointed by President George W. Bush in 2007 in addition to retired last year. “Their work has to be respected. Hopefully, This specific won’t change the way they do their work. They might be more fearful, nevertheless they’ll still do the work. They’re gutsy people, nevertheless of which is actually hard. The system was not designed with This specific.”

Suspicion of Obama loyalists

Trump has been skeptical of government watchdogs coming from even before he took office. Sources tell CNN of which after winning election in 2016, Trump instructed officials to identify those IGs who were believed to be Obama-loyalists to ensure they could be removed in addition to replaced with more Trump-friendly options.

In January 2017, White House staff phoned the Treasury in addition to Labor department IGs to inform them they could soon receive pink slips, according to Daniel Meyer, who led the Whistleblowing in addition to Source Protection Program at the Office of the Intelligence Community Inspector General until he was fired in March 2018 by then-Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats. 

While those broader firings never occurred, Trump has maintained his suspicion of IGs throughout his time in office, multiple sources said. Those suspicions were amplified last year when Atkinson sent the whistleblower complaint to Congress. Since then, Trump has become increasingly fixated on removing IGs he views as holdovers coming from the Obama administration, according to multiple sources. 

“of which is actually not rocket science what the President is actually doing here. He has said publicly of which he is actually the oversight authority in addition to the IGs work for him,” Meyer told CNN.

During his time in office, Trump has tweeted more than 25 times about various inspectors general in addition to their reports, almost always using them to deride his opponents or to accuse IGs of bias, without ever providing credible proof.
He called Justice Department IG Michael Horowitz an “Obama guy” when of which looked like he was slow-walking a review of surveillance abuses during the Russia investigation. nevertheless when Horowitz’s report turned out, in addition to exposed serious wrongdoing, Trump hailed the findings in addition to still touts them to This specific day.

During the impeachment saga, Trump accused Atkinson of perpetuating a “hoax” in addition to colluding with Democrats by sharing the Ukraine whistleblower complaint with Congress, which he was required to do by law. Atkinson at This specific point says he believes his firing last week was retaliation for the Ukraine affair.

‘Whistleblowing vacuum’

Even though they aren’t well known, IGs have long served a crucial role in ferreting out waste, fraud in addition to abuse inside the government. of which role becomes even more crucial as the federal government begins doling out the record amount of coronavirus relief funds.

“Few Americans know what an Inspector General is actually, nevertheless we all suffer when they are punished for their independence,” said Irvin McCullough, national security analyst for the Government Accountability Project. 

“These watchdogs are entrusted to enforce whistleblowers’ protections. If these watchdogs are attacked, defamed, in addition to removed for their integrity, then the federal workforce will no longer trust them with their whistleblowing complaints. We will live in a whistleblowing vacuum,” he added. 

Even members of Trump’s own party are urging him to cool down. Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, a staunch advocate for inspectors general in addition to congressional oversight, responded to Trump’s moves using a statement, reminding Trump of which the law requires him to notify Congress ahead of any termination of a Senate-confirmed inspector general in addition to to provide a written explanation.

“Inspectors General provide a critical check on an otherwise unaccountable bureaucracy,” Grassley wrote. “In additional words, they help drain the swamp.”

Checks in addition to Balances, the group of conservative in addition to libertarian lawyers co-founded by George Conway, released a statement Monday charging of which Michael Atkinson’s firing underscored Trump’s “contempt for the rule of law.”

“While a president has the authority to nominate in addition to select officials in his administration, he does not hold the authority to make a mockery of the Appointments Clause of the Constitution, statutory mandates in addition to Senate confirmation,” the lawyers said.

Pandemic relief IGs most at risk

Many inside the IG in addition to whistleblower community believe those career officials on the Pandemic Response Accountability Committee are most at risk, including DOJ IG Michael Horowitz, who also heads the panel of IGs with the authority to pick the chair of of which committee.

“People on the committee are likely at the top of list,” according to a former attorney for the Ukraine whistleblower, Andrew Bakaj, who noted of which he is actually particularly concerned about Horowitz’s future. “Horowitz has proven to be independent in addition to neutral, as he should be. Anyone who displays any sort of independence in addition to neutrality is actually seen as a threat by This specific White House.”

While Horowitz remains in his role, current in addition to former officials caution of which, as with any decision Trump makes, of which could change with 1 tweet. The fact of which Horowitz has published sharply critical investigations into the FBI’s handling of politically sensitive probes of Hillary Clinton in addition to the President’s campaign may help protect him, congressional sources in addition to Justice Department officials tell CNN.

Horowitz has won high marks coming from key lawmakers including Grassley in addition to Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, in addition to he also incorporates a Great relationship with Attorney General William Barr, officials note.

Horowitz is actually currently overseeing a deeper look at what he has said were serious concerns about the FBI’s management of national security surveillance warrants under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Trump has recently praised of which work for highlighting the FBI’s mistakes, an issue about which Trump has long complained.

Still, several IG postings have been occupied by acting officials after Trump nominees have been forced to withdraw coming from consideration for various reasons, in addition to former inspectors general say of which Trump’s actions may have already muddied the waters in terms of the perceived independence of current watchdogs. Of course, Trump’s battle with the IGs may end up costing more than just their independence.

“The American people are better off when the inspectors general are given free rein to audit in addition to investigate,” said Clark Ervin, a Bush appointee who issued hard-hitting reports as the first IG at the Department of Homeland Security. “The proof is actually inside the pudding. Billions of taxpayer dollars have been recovered as a result of their efforts, which is actually far more than their collective budgets.”

Source : Trump escalates anti-oversight efforts by attacking inspectors general